Anterior Implant Patient Case

Replacing a Failing Front Bridge with Implant Support

A staged approach using socket preservation, guided bone regeneration and a porcelain bridge

The patient attended with intermittent swelling, bleeding, an unpleasant taste and movement affecting an upper front tooth-supported bridge. The bridge extended from the upper-right central incisor to the upper-left lateral incisor and felt as though it moved towards the gum during biting. Assessment showed that its supporting teeth could no longer provide a predictable foundation: the upper-left lateral incisor had a root fracture, while the upper-right central incisor showed extensive root resorption associated with previous childhood dental trauma.

A staged plan was developed to remove the compromised teeth, manage the affected sites, limit loss of the anterior ridge contours where possible and rebuild the area before fitting an implant-supported porcelain bridge.

Left: restoration following treatment. Right: implant-supported bridge at the five-year clinical review. Clinical photographs are published with verified patient website consent. Findings and outcomes are individual.

Assessment and planning records

  • Clinical assessment of the failing upper anterior tooth-supported bridge
  • Digital radiographs showing root resorption affecting the upper-right central incisor
  • Assessment of a root fracture affecting the upper-left lateral incisor
  • Three-dimensional CBCT assessment of the residual bone and planned grafting sites
  • Clinical photography to record the smile and soft-tissue contours

01

Assessment of the Failing Anterior Bridge

The upper-left lateral incisor had a root fracture beneath the existing restoration, affecting its ability to support the bridge. The upper-right central incisor showed progressive root resorption.

The history, clinical findings and imaging were considered together. As neither abutment tooth offered a predictable restorative foundation, removal and implant-supported replacement were discussed alongside the relevant alternatives, stages and risks.

02

Stage 1: Extractions and Socket Preservation

The compromised upper-right central and upper-left lateral incisors were carefully removed. The extraction sites and remaining facial bone were assessed during surgery.

Socket preservation was used to help limit the expected dimensional changes that follow extraction and to support the later implant plan. It cannot prevent all bone remodelling.

Bone-graft material and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), prepared from the patient's own blood, were placed where indicated. The sites were then monitored during an approximately four-month healing period.

03

Stage 2: Implant Placement and Guided Bone Regeneration

After the initial healing phase, the anterior ridge was reassessed and two dental implants were placed in positions planned to support the bridge.

Guided bone regeneration was carried out at the same visit where additional facial bone volume was required. The graft combined locally collected autogenous bone with a bovine-derived bone substitute.

A resorbable membrane was placed over the graft to separate it from the overlying soft tissues during early healing. A further healing period of approximately four months was planned before definitive restoration.

04

Stage 3: Implant-Supported Porcelain Bridge

After implant integration and soft-tissue healing had been assessed, the provisional restoration was removed and the implant foundations and restorative space were reviewed.

An individually made implant-supported porcelain bridge was fitted. Its fit, cleaning access, shade, contours, speech and bite contacts were evaluated before completion.

05

Stage 4: Maintenance and Continuing Care

The patient received individual guidance on cleaning beneath the bridge and around the implant components, together with a recommended programme of dental and professional hygiene reviews.

Ongoing assessment is important for monitoring the surrounding tissues, ceramic surfaces, bridge fit, screw connections and bite forces. Referred patients can return to their general dentist with a treatment report and maintenance recommendations.

Clinical limitations and maintenance considerations

  • Tissue remodelling: Final bone volume and gum contours depend on the original defect, tissue thickness, surgical response, general health and healing. Complete symmetry cannot be guaranteed.
  • Staged healing: Root resorption, fracture and chronic inflammation may require debridement and staged healing before implants can be placed. Timelines can change according to clinical findings.
  • Grafting: Socket preservation and guided bone regeneration can support an implant plan but do not guarantee a particular volume of regenerated bone or remove every surgical risk.
  • Restorative maintenance: Implant-supported porcelain bridges can chip, wear, loosen or require repair or replacement and need continuing clinical and hygiene review.

About this patient case

This page describes one patient's assessment and treatment. Implant and grafting suitability, healing time, risks, maintenance requirements and outcomes vary. It does not guarantee that another patient will be suitable for the same approach or experience the same result.